Print this Page

What's New

Resources updated between Monday, February 28, 2011 and Sunday, March 06, 2011

March 6, 2011

Friday, March 04, 2011

Click here to see the article by Anne Bayefsky today on Fox News.

Today, Iran officially becomes a member of the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women. Only three days ago, the U.N. General Assembly voted to suspend Libya's membership on the U.N. Human Rights Council in a desperate bid to save the Council's tattered reputation and itself.

But not a single state, including the United States, has indicated anything but smooth sailing for today's membership of Iran on the U.N.'s top women's rights body.

The double-talk surrounding the Libyan maneuver was breathtaking. It was only nine months ago, after getting to know Qaddafi over four decades, that the General Assembly had elected Libya to serve on the U.N.'s top human rights body. And Libya still serves on the U.N. Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, the U.N. Commission on Information, and the Executive Board of U.N. Women.

The U.N. has no intention of really cleaning house, since there would be no baby left with the bath water. Here is just a glimpse of the authority figures that the UN system currently has in place to run its global operations on human rights, women's equality, protection of children and refugees, free flow of information, social and democratic development and crime prevention.

UN Human Rights Council

    Mission: "...responsible for promoting universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all...."

    Members: Saudi Arabia, China, Vice-Presidents: Cuba, Angola
UN Commission on the Status of Women (starting Friday, March 4, 2011)

UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

    Mission: "...set...out global strategy to prevent crime and promote stable criminal justice systems...and improving the efficiency and fairness of criminal justice administration systems."

    Members: Libya, Russia, Sudan, Iran, DRC, Pakistan
UN Women

    Mission: ", address and contribute to gender equality and the empowerment and the advancement of women..."

    Members: Executive Board: DRC, Saudi Arabia, China, Libya
UN Economic and Social Council

    Mission: "...responsible for: promoting higher standards of living, full employment, and economic and social progress...encouraging universal respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms..."

    Members: Saudi Arabia
UN Commission on Sustainable Development

    Mission: " promote dialogue and build partnerships for sustainable development with major groups include[ing] women, youth, indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations, local authorities, workers and trade unions, business and industry, the scientific community, and farmers..."

    Members: Angola, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia
UN Commission on Social Development

    Mission: "....promoting full employment and decent work for all...Improving public sector effectiveness....National and international cooperation for social development..."

    Members: Cuba, Egypt, Zimbabwe
UN Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations

    Mission: "...The consideration of applications for consultative status [with the UN]...submitted by NGOs..."

    Members: Sudan, Cuba, Pakistan, China
UN Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT)

    Mission: "...promote socially and environmentally sustainable towns and cities with the goal of providing adequate shelter for of tenure and equal access to economic resources for all, with a specific focus on gender equality."

    Members: Governing Council: Iran
UN Committee on Information

    Mission: "To promote the establishment of a new, more just and more effective world information and communication order...based on the free circulation and wider and better-balanced dissemination of information..."

    Members: China, Kazakhstan, Libya, Iran
UN Children's Fund (UNICEF)

    Mission: "....advocate for the protection of children's rights, to help meet their basic needs and to expand their opportunities to reach their full potential..."

    Members: Executive Board: Sudan, China
UN High Commissioner for Refugees

    Mission: "...safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees."

    Members: Executive Committee: Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan
UN World Food Programme

    Mission: "...advocate policies, strategies and operations that directly benefit the poor and hungry."

    Members: Executive Board: Sudan

Draft was adopted with 26 votes in favor, 2 against and 8 abstentions.

Draft Resolution "Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women" Development

March 3, 2011

March 2, 2011

March 1, 2011

Monday, February 28, 2011

Click here to see the article by Anne Bayefsky today on Fox News.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration are on an urgent rescue mission for the United Nations Human Rights Council. Clinton is not in Geneva today to do something about human rights. She is in Geneva to protect the administration's investment in the U.N. human rights organization's top body, which only six months ago welcomed Libya as a full member and only three months ago passed it through its meaningless "universal periodic review" process, touted as its number one monitoring procedure.

Saving the Council's reputation will be no mean feat. After all, the U.N. has spent years promoting Libya as a human rights authority figure it was president of its Human Rights Commission in 2003 before being elected to the "reformed" Human Rights Council. Clinton's trip assumed such urgency because President Obama made the decision to join the Council the flagship of his U.N.-focused foreign policy.

That decision is also in very big trouble for something that happened Thursday of last week and has traveled below the radar screen as the Council and the rest of the U.N. system try to cover-up their support for Qaddafi all these years.

The explicit reason that the administration joined the Council was to engage "from the inside" in a reform process. When the Council was created in 2006 by the General Assembly, it was given five years to review its progress and reform anything found lacking. On Thursday, that review process came to its conclusion and today Clinton tried to do everything possible to hide its abysmal failure.

The Council has two obvious flaws. Number one it has a standing agenda that governs all of its operations, with ten items on it. One is dedicated to condemning the state of Israel and one is for the remaining 191 UN countries that it might be interested in should it ever decide there was another "human rights situations that require[d] the Council's attention." The singular effort to use its so-called human rights system to demonize the Jewish state has been a roaring success. Half of its special sessions on specific countries and half of all its resolutions and decisions critical of any state condemn Israel alone.

When the President Obama joined the Council it promised that changing the discriminatory agenda would be their first priority. On Thursday, we discovered, it was a hoax. The review process has been going on in the context of a working group of all interested members of the U.N. The working group adopted its report on Thursday by consensus with the U.S. present. And in the usual opaque U.N. language, the consensus report states: "The Council's agenda and framework for programme of work are as is specified in the annex to Council resolution 5/1." In plain English, that means business as usual, resolution 5/1 being the discriminatory agenda adopted in June 2007.

The loss can be measured by the administration's own words. On October 27 of last year the U.S. delegation placed on the table its demands for reform duly transmitted to an American audience. Agenda reform was top of the list. "The most entrenched and indefensible manifestation of structural bias in this Council comes in the form of...the only agenda item devoted to one country...The United States believes strongly a group charged with examining what must be done to improve the credibility and efficacy of this Council it is incumbent upon us do what is right to help the Council become more evenhanded and depoliticized."

Secretary Clinton today repeated the mantra. But what she did not say is that when the business-as-usual U.N. "reform" report was approved late Thursday, the only thing the U.S. delegation did was to make a short statement that it "did not support" the permanent Israel-bashing item. In the world of U.N. diplomacy that is backstabbing at its finest.

If the Obama administration had really wanted to stand on principle they could have said "we do not join consensus on this document." They could have demanded that there be a vote in the Council on the document before sending it to the General Assembly for formal approval, and then voted against it for the world to see. And most importantly, they could have made it very clear that the absence of a change would result in the U.S. departure from the Council. They did none of the above.

Instead, Obama caved. Saving the Council was most important and the U.S. was going down with the ship. The "reform" process will now proceed merrily through the U.N. system without a glitch. The President of the General Assembly said this morning: "I congratulate the Working Group on adopting the Human Rights Council review by consensus." The U.S. delegation was all present. Nobody peeped.

The second obvious flaw with the Human Rights Council that Hillary is trying her hardest to paper over is its membership. How did Libya get on the Council in the first place? U.S. Ambassador John Bolton pointed out when the U.S. voted against the General Assembly resolution that adopted the Council that it had no membership criteria. The only requirement is this: "when electing members of the Council, Member States [of the U.N. General Assembly] shall take into account the contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights and their voluntary pledges and commitments made thereto."

The U.N. set up a lovely website where candidates can deposit their "pledges." Here is what Libya pledged last May, which was just fine by the vast majority of members of the General Assembly. "The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya is fully committed to the promotion and protection of human rights principles...including the right to direct participation in public life...The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya has paid great attention to human rights over the past 30 years." That statement was good enough to garner the votes of 155 of 188 UN members and to send Libya to the Council.

But Libya was not alone. Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba and company are all members of this morally bankrupt institution which Secretary Clinton is doing her damnedest to save.

And then there's this: On Friday, March 4, Iran the country that buries women naked to their waist and then stones them to death for "adultery" is going to take its seat as a full-fledged member of the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women.

If President Obama and his secretary of state really understood the error of using the United Nations to prop up human rights demons, then rather than attempting, even today, to help the Human Rights Council cover its tracks, it should be telling the world and the U.N. to remove Iran from the Commission on the Status of Women.

And it should resign from the Human Rights Council effective immediately now that its "reform" has proved to be impossible as was obvious to human rights victims from the start.

But don't hold your breath. The Obama administration would rather promote the institution of the United Nations than save real people from the U.N.'s grotesque neglect.