Human Rights Voices
  • Home
  • What's New
  • Videos
  • Gallery
  • About
  • Who
  • Contact
  • DONATE

November 19, 2020

United States Explanation of Vote on a Resolution on the Durban Declaration and Program of Action

"The United States remains firmly committed to countering racism and racial discrimination in all its forms. Indeed, we recognize a special obligation to do so given historical injustices perpetrated during past eras of colonial expansion into indigenous communities, slavery, and the Jim Crow period. Our transparency, commitment to a free press, and insistence on ensuring that justice is served allow the world to witness our challenges and contribute to our efforts to find solutions. These values, often discussed in multilateral organizations, are fundamental to our nation. We pledge to continue our work with civil society, international mechanisms, and all nations of goodwill to combat the consequences of this legacy of injustice.

As a State Party to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the United States believes the CERD provides comprehensive protections in this area and constitutes the most relevant international framework to address all forms of racial discrimination. We continue to raise the profile of, and participate in, activities in support of the International Decade for People of African Descent. In addition, we remain deeply concerned about speech that advocates national, racial, or religious hatred, particularly when it constitutes discrimination, hostility, or incitement to violence. From our own experience and history, the United States remains convinced that the best antidote to offensive speech is not a ban and punishment, but a combination of robust legal protections against discrimination and hate crimes; proactive government outreach to racial and religious minority communities; and the vigorous protection of freedom of expression, both on- and off-line.

As in similar years, however, we regret that we cannot support this resolution – on such an important topic – because the text is not genuinely focused on countering racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. Among our concerns about the resolution are its endorsements of the Durban Declaration and Program of Action (DDPA), the outcome of the Durban review conference and its endorsement of overbroad restrictions on freedom of speech and expression. We reject any effort to advance the "full implementation" of the DDPA. We believe this resolution serves as a vehicle to prolong the divisions caused by the original Durban conference and its follow-up mechanisms, rather than providing a comprehensive and inclusive way forward for the international community to counter the scourge of racism and racial discrimination.

In addition, the United States cannot accept the resolution's call for States to consider withdrawing reservations to Article 4 of the CERD. We note, further, that this resolution has no effect as a matter of international law. We also categorically reject the resolution's call for "former colonial Powers" to provide reparations "consistent with" the DDPA.

The United States notes with concern that the resolution remains silent on the issue of oppression of members of ethnic minority groups in the People's Republic of China, which regularly oppresses its own people, including members of minority groups of Asian, Turkic, and other descent. In Xinjiang, a merciless crackdown has resulted in the mass arbitrary detention of more than one million Uyghur Muslims and members of other ethnic and religious minority groups, forced labor, forced sterilizations, and other serious human rights abuses.

In addition to our longstanding concerns with this resolution, we are troubled that it would also create a new High-Level Week official event during the 76th General Assembly commemorating the Durban Declaration and Program of Action. It is inappropriate for the General Assembly to host this divisive and costly event.

For these reasons, we must again vote against this resolution, and we urge other delegations to do the same."
Date
November 19, 2020
Title
United States Explanation of Vote on a Resolution on the Durban Declaration and Program of Action at the U.N. General Assembly Third Committee, United States Mission to the United Nations
Original Source
https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-on-a-resolution-on-the-durban-declaration-and-program-of-action/
Attachment
Click here to view this document in MS Word/PDF format

Related Documents

Date Title
12/31/2020 Explanation of Vote by Ambassador Kelly Craft on the 2021 United Nations Program Budget
12/31/2020 Israel Explanation of Vote Against the U.N. 2021 Program Budget
12/31/2020 U.N. General Assembly Resolution, “A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism,… and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action,” A/RES/75/237
12/31/2020 U.N. General Assembly Resolution, “Programme budget for 2021,” A/RES/75/254 A-C
12/31/2020 Voting results for U.N. General Assembly Resolution, “A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism,… and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action,” A/RES/75/237
12/31/2020 Voting results on U.N. General Assembly Resolution, “Programme budget for 2021,” A/RES/75/254 A-C
12/30/2020 Programme budget implications of draft resolution “A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action,” A/75/678
12/30/2020 Draft decision on Programme budget implications relating to the programme budget for 2020: comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, A/C.5/75/L.15
12/30/2020 Programme budget for 2021, A/C.5/75/L.19
12/30/2020 Remarks by the United States to the Fifth Committee on the Program Budget Implications for the Durban Conference
12/30/2020 Statement by Israel in Explanation of Vote on U.S. Amendment on Durban Before the Vote
12/30/2020 Voting result for oral amendment submitted by the United States to delete funding relating to the Durban Conference and Durban Declaration and Programme of Action from document A/C.5/75/L.15
12/30/2020 Voting results for Programme budget for 2021, A/C.5/75/L.19
11/19/2020 Draft U.N. General Assembly Resolution, “A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism,… and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action”, A/C.3/75/L.50/Rev.1
11/19/2020 European Union Explanation of Vote on a Resolution on the Durban Declaration and Program of Action at the U.N. General Assembly Third Committee
11/19/2020 Israel Explanation of Vote on a Resolution on the Durban Declaration and Program of Action at the U.N. General Assembly Third Committee
11/19/2020 United Kingdom Explanation of Vote on a Resolution on the Durban Declaration and Program of Action at the U.N. General Assembly Third Committee
  • Print this Page
Back to Top
  • © Copyright 2012-2023, Human Rights Voices and respective authors. All Rights Reserved.
  • RSS

Source: